\nMind the gap: Study shows estimates of current land-based emissions vary between models due to differing definitions<\/strong><\/a>
\nby International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in www.phys.org, Nov 22, 2023. “A new study published<\/a> in Nature demonstrates that estimates of current land-based emissions vary between scientific models and national greenhouse gas inventories due to differing definitions of what qualifies as “managed” land and human-induced, or anthropogenic removals on that land, and shows how global mitigation benchmarks change when accounting for land use, land-use change, and forestry (LULUCF) fluxes in scientific models from the national inventory perspective.”<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/versicolor.ca\/nstriad\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Screen-Shot-2023-06-10-at-9.21.03-AM-300x196.png\")
<\/a>Canada’s “Managed and Unmanaged Forests”<\/strong>. Screen capture (Source<\/a>). Comment:<\/em> I guess if the forests are potentially readily accessible to intensive forestry but we leave them alone, we consider them “managed”. ‘Sure makes the forestry-related GHG balances look better; surely obscures the real impacts of intensive forestry practices on GHG balances.<\/p><\/div>\n Government of Canada<\/strong> Critiques<\/strong> Canada\u2019s Emissions Accounting Obscures Climate Costs of Logging, Reports Warn<\/strong><\/a> Nova Scotia<\/strong> PEI<\/strong> RELATED NEWS<\/p>\n Apr 24, 2024: Apr 11, 2024: Mar 11, 2024: Feb 23, 2024: Jan 31, 2024: Jan 26, 2024: Dec 19, 2023: Dec 7, 2023: – Oil and gas must cut emissions more than a third by 2030<\/strong><\/a> Dec 6, 2023: Revolutionizing what we understand about America\u2019s forests<\/strong><\/a> Nov 26, 2023: Nov 16, 2023: Nov 14, 2023: Nov 13, 2023: Nov 12, 2013 Nov 9, 2023: <\/p>\n Oct 30, 2023 Oct 27, 2023 Sep 28, 2023 July 28, 2023 July 24, 2023 July 6, 2023 June 1, 2023 Also view: Protected Areas in Nova Scotia help to mitigate climate change, clearcuts do not<\/a> THE ACCOUNTING ISSUE International Mind the gap: Study shows estimates of current land-based emissions vary between models due to differing definitions by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in www.phys.org, Nov 22, 2023. “A new study published in Nature demonstrates … Continue reading
\nCanada\u2019s forest carbon reporting system<\/a>
\n“The National Forest Carbon Monitoring, Accounting and Reporting System (NFCMARS) is Canada\u2019s forest carbon reporting system. Its purpose is to estimate forest carbon stocks, changes in carbon stocks, and emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases in Canada\u2019s managed forests.”<\/p>\n
\nConcerns about Canada\u2019s forest carbon quantification and accounting<\/strong><\/a>
\nOffice of the Auditor General of Canada\/Environmental Petitions. Summary: This petition raises concerns about how the federal government accounts for carbon emissions and removals from Canadian forests…The petition asserts that wildfire emissions are under-reported, and that the federal government has an overly broad definition of what constitutes a \u201cmanaged forest.\u201d … Status: Completed – Response(s) to petition received<\/p>\n
\nChristopher Bonasia for the Energy Mix, May 9, 2023<\/p>\n
\n\u201cNew paper out on life cycle #GHG dynamics for different scenarios of forest-based bioenergy in Nova Scotia\u201d<\/strong><\/a>
\nPost on this website, \u00a021 Jan 2023<\/p>\n
\nP.E.I.’s new forestry commission lists 5 ways to modernize how wood becomes energy<\/strong><\/a>
\nArturo Chang \u00b7 CBC News. July 20, 2023: The commission offered five recommendations:
\n– That all biomass supply contracts for the 44 provincially owned buildings should be renegotiated to provide more clarity.
\n– That there is a clearer definition of biomass in those revised contracts.
\n– That for future projects, there’s a comprehensive review of the environmental impact of biomass harvesting on the long-term wood supply, including an assessment of the carbon emissions from moving the product from harvest sites to the plant.
\n– That the government more clearly define the role of public forests as a potential source of biomass for provincially owned buildings.
\n– That it determines how the forest biomass sector can contribute to the province’s “Path to Net Zero” by 2040.<\/p>\n
\n
\nHow hurricanes threaten forests \u2014 and the carbon markets that depend on them<\/strong><\/a>
\n by Saul Elbein in The Hill. “A single hurricane barreling into New England forests can undo decades of carbon storage, a new study has found” References this scientific paper: Hurricanes pose a substantial risk to New England forest carbon stocks<\/a>
\nShersingh Joseph Tumber-D\u00e1vila et al, in Global Change Biology.<\/p>\n
\nThe Arctic Is Burning \u2013 And It Is Changing The World<\/strong><\/a>
\nTRINE JONASSEN in www.highnorthnews.com<\/p>\n
\nP.E.I. seeks feedback on sustainability of biomass supply as part of forest policy<\/strong><\/a>
\nBy Todd Humber in Canadian Biomass
\n“The paper posed four questions on the issue of the sustainability of biomass supply:
\n“-What should be the role of the Forests, Fish and Wildlife Division in monitoring the harvest of biomass used for heating and other purposes?
\n-What system of measurement should be used to define sustainability of biomass harvesting on individual woodlots and on a province-wide basis?
\n-What system of measurement should be used by the provincial government to assess applications for wood biomass projects under the Environmental Protection Act\u2019s Environmental Impact Assessment process?
\n-Should limits be placed on biomass harvesting and, if so, by what means?
\nThe discussion paper and survey are available at PEI Forestry Commission. The deadline for feedback is August 31, 2024”
\nSee PEI Forestry Commission<\/a> for details<\/p>\n
\nForests can add value without being clearcut<\/strong><\/a>
\nBy Moira Donovan in National Observer. “In Nova Scotia, forests are potential wellsprings of biodiversity, sustainable livelihoods, and long-term climate change mitigation. Yet despite that potential, thousands of acres of forests are clearcut every year in the name of short-term profit. A company called Growing Forests is now aiming to combat that immediate threat, using ecological forestry and carbon offsets as an alternative to unsustainable practices.While the project has the potential to protect the long-term health of the forest \u2014 and of the planet \u2014 Dale Prest, Growing Forests\u2019 CEO, says at its heart the company is motivated by a shared interest in rural communities: to protect and restore forests, and maintain local ownership of the land. \u201cCarbon is just the way we pay for that to happen,\u201d he says.”
\nCompany Website: Growing Forests<\/a> Address: 7748 Highway 7,
\nMusquodoboit Harbour, Nova Scotia
\nThx for your pesistence Dale & Co.!!!<\/em><\/p>\n
\n3 Reasons Why Forest Carbon Offsets Don\u2019t Always Work<\/strong><\/a>
\nAndrew Moore in NC State News. “While reducing emissions through carbon offsets is important to reaching global net zero goals, the effectiveness of the REDD+ framework remains in question. Erin Sills, the Edwin F. Conger Professor of forest economics at NC State, along with other researchers, studied REDD+ projects that generate carbon offsets for the voluntary market and found that many projects overestimate their impact.”<\/p>\n
\nHow the EU\u2019s Definition of Forest Degradation Is Sparking Controversy in Canada<\/strong><\/a>
\nBy Alice Palmer in Sustainable Forests, Resilient Industry. Defining forest degradation in terms of whether or not a logged site is replanted satisfies neither industry not the conservation community.<\/p>\n
\nNorthern Perspectives on the European Deforestation Regulation<\/strong><\/a>
\nBy Gordon Murray, The Wood Pellet Association of Canada<\/p>\n
\n– MPs urge government to get serious about tracking logging emissions<\/strong><\/a>
\nBy Kate Allen Climate Change Reporter for The Star. “Every year, the federal government reports how much the logging industry contributes to our economy: $34.8 billion of Canada\u2019s GDP in 2021, according to the latest figures. But how much does that sector contribute to the climate crisis? The answer is hazy, because of what environmental groups, scientists, and Ottawa\u2019s environment commissioner have described as a lack of transparency around the federal government\u2019s emissions reporting. Now a group of more than 25 MPs and senators, including nine Liberals, have added their names to the growing chorus of calls to change how emissions from logging are tracked, saying the current system is “undermining public accountability and creating a hidden subsidy for carbon pollution from the sector.”<\/p>\n
\nBy Mia Rabson, The Canadian Press reported in advisor.ca “Companies can buy offset credits or contribute to a decarbonization fund that would lower their required reduction”
\nRelated, see: The arc of progress in global carbon markets bends toward integrity<\/a> <\/strong>by Manulife March 22, 2023 “As the world continues to adapt to climate change, carbon markets are integral to aiding the transition to net-zero emissions. Carbon markets must continue to strengthen to build stakeholder confidence and ensure that climate mitigation is delivered, highlighting the importance of establishing clear carbon standards that are systematically applied throughout development and management lifecycles to ensure quality and integrity.” Comment: Time for the B.S. about forest carbon accounting to end if NS woodlot\/forested land owners and managers want to benefit which would also be good for our forests and biodiversity.<\/p>\n
\nCarbon removal is needed to achieve net zero but has its own climate risks<\/strong><\/a>
\nIn The Conversation. “…Net-zero carbon dioxide (CO\u2082) emissions refers to a balance between CO\u2082 emissions into the atmosphere and CO\u2082 removals from the atmosphere, such that the net effect on CO\u2082 levels in the atmosphere is zero. It is often assumed that if such a balance is achieved, the net effect on climate would also be zero. However, in a recent paper in Nature Climate Change<\/a>, we show that unless we consider a number of other factors \u2014 such as permanence of carbon stored in vegetation and soils, changes in the reflectivity of landscapes and the full suite of greenhouse gases emitted \u2014 balancing CO\u2082 emissions with removals will not achieve the intended climate goal.<\/p>\n
\nIn news.nau.edu\/ “Forests and the carbon they capture play a pivotal role in combating climate change, and a new study co-authored by NAU researchers is set to transform forest conservation efforts nationwide by providing new, more accurate models for calculating and predicting how much carbon they hold.”<\/p>\n
\nWhat is biomass? The latest fuel source to get clean tech tax credits<\/a>
\nBy David Baxter Global News. “Ottawa plans on expanding its clean technology and electricity tax credits to include heat and electricity produced by burning biomass, as outlined in its fall economic statement…However, some environmental groups argue that biomass is not as green as it seems, including Stand Earth”. A balanced report.<\/p>\n
\nReviewing use of wood chips for heat: Forestry Commission provides P.E.I. government with five recommendations<\/strong><\/a>
\nBy Caitlin Coombes in The Hamilton Spectator<\/p>\n
\nP.E.I. MLA outraged at burning of 20K cubic metres of Fiona debris<\/strong><\/a>
\nBy Caitlin Coombes for Canadian Biomass “An estimated 20,000 cubic meters of waste from post-tropical storm Fiona is being burned…\u201cDoes this not go against everything the province has been trying to lessen our greenhouse gas emissions and reduce carbon output?\u201d Fox asked Myers”<\/p>\n
\nHow Much Can Trees Fight Climate Change? Massively, but Not Alone, Study Finds<\/strong><\/a>.<\/strong>
\nBy Catrin Einhorn The New York Times<\/p>\n
\nFloating factories of artificial leaves could make green fuel for jets and ship<\/a><\/strong>
\nBy Robin McKie The Guardian<\/p>\n
\nCanada says it can fight climate change and be major oil nation. Massive fires may force a reckoning<\/a><\/strong>
\nBy Suman Naishadham and Victor Cavan The Associated Press<\/p>\n
\nHe Pioneered Carbon Offsets to Save Tropical Forests. Now the Market Is Collapsing.<\/strong><\/a>
\nBy Phred Dvorak in the Wall Street Journal Oct 30, 2023 “Mike Korchinsky used offset credits to funnel millions of dollars to conservation projects. Now he\u2019s fighting a crisis of confidence in the industry.”<\/p>\n
\n‘Soil is everything’: Inside one Dal prof’s work to understand how dirt can help humanityDal prof’s work to understand how dirt can help humanity<\/strong><\/a>
\nArticle in Dal News by Stephanie Rogers, Oct 27, 2023.”Dr. Brandon Heung likes thinking about soil…Dr. Heung\u2019s work falls under the umbrella of digital soil mapping and understanding how soils change over space and time…Dr. Heung and a group of Dalhousie researchers recently received funding from the Forestry Innovation Transition Trust to undertake research on Nova Scotia\u2019s forests over the next five years. \u201cWe\u2019re trying to understand carbon dynamics within the forest, looking at how much carbon we can sequester into the soil,\u201d he said. \u201cI like trying to understand the relationship between the environment and soil.”<\/p>\n
\nTemporary carbon storage in forests has climate value \u2014 but we need to get the accounting right<\/strong><\/a>
\nH. Damon Matthews et al., in The Conversation Sep 28, 2023. “…what if we measured and tracked both the amount and time of carbon storage? As we show in our new research published in Nature Communications<\/a>, this can be done using the tonne-year metric \u2014 defined as the amount of carbon storage multiplied by the number of years that it remains stored.”<\/p>\n
\nFarmers are being paid millions to trap carbon in their soils. Will it actually help the planet?<\/strong><\/a>
\nG. Popkin in Science Vol 381, Issue 6656.<\/p>\n
\nThe carbon costs of global wood harvests<\/strong><\/a>
\nLiqing Peng et al., 2023 in Nature. Related: Just How Good Is Wood?<\/a> By Mark Harris in Anthropocene Magazine July 24, 2023<\/p>\n
\nWhat does carbon offset actually mean for US forests?<\/strong><\/a>
\nby Sarah Kuta, University of Colorado at Boulder in phys.org “In a single calendar year, a mature tree can take in roughly 48 pounds of CO2, which remains stored in its woody fibers until some event\u2014like a wildfire, a pest infestation or clearcutting by a logging company\u2014triggers its release into the atmosphere. This natural process is at the heart of the world’s carbon offset industry, in which companies and consumers counteract their CO2 emissions by buying credits from projects that remove or reduce emissions. Carbon offsetting is part of a broader group of so-called nature-based solutions to human-caused climate change. Now, researchers at the University of Colorado Boulder are working to bring more transparency to this fast-growing industry.” Cites this paper: Lilli Kaarakka et al, Managing forests for carbon\u2013Status of the forest carbon offset markets in the United States<\/a>, PLOS Climate (2023). DOI: 10.1371\/journal.pclm.0000158<\/p>\n
\nThe effectiveness of global protected areas for climate change mitigation<\/strong><\/a>
\nL. Duncanson et al. in Nature Communications “Forests play a critical role in stabilizing Earth\u2019s climate. Establishing protected areas (PAs) represents one approach to forest conservation, but PAs were rarely created to mitigate climate change. The global impact of PAs on the carbon cycle has not previously been quantified due to a lack of accurate global-scale carbon stock maps. Here we used ~412 million lidar samples from NASA\u2019s GEDI mission to estimate a total PA aboveground carbon (C) stock of 61.43 Gt (+\/\u2212 0.31), 26% of all mapped terrestrial woody C. Of this total, 9.65\u2009+\u2009\/\u2212 0.88 Gt of additional carbon was attributed to PA status. These higher C stocks are primarily from avoided emissions from deforestation and degradation in PAs compared to unprotected forests. This total is roughly equivalent to one year of annual global fossil fuel emissions. These results underscore the importance of conservation of high biomass forests for avoiding carbon emissions and preserving future sequestration.”<\/p>\n
\nPost on NSFN May 26, 2017. Cites this paper: Cameron, R. P., and P. Bush. “Are protected areas an effective way to help mitigate climate change?: A comparative carbon sequestration model for protected areas and forestry management in Nova Scotia, Canada.<\/a>”\u00a0The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies<\/i>\u00a011 (2016): 1-13.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"